Advantages of using ffp ribbond in direct restorations in structurally compromised teeth

a biomimetic approach

  • Luciana Vieira de Almeida Soares
  • Renata Gontijo Bernardes Lins Faculdade Cathedral
  • Lucas Carvalho Simão
  • Larissa Cristine Ferreira de Pinho
Keywords: Keywords: Properties and characteristics. Benefits. Using the FFP Ribbond.

Abstract

This study aims to identify the properties and characteristics of FFP Ribbond, as well as the advantages of using FFP Ribbond in direct restoration of structurally compromised teeth, with a biomimetic approach. As for the methods, a bibliographical research was carried out, based on the U.S. National Library of Medicine (PUBMED), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO) and Google Academic. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of FFP Ribbond, whether due to its important molecular weight, which makes it possible to reinforce masticatory tensions, or due to the reduction in contraction tension, protection of the adhesive interface and resistance to fracture. Still as an advantage, it was found that making the weft on a polyethylene basis; gives high strength; aesthetics and easy accommodation (without molecular memory); does not show fraying; has clinical and laboratory use; comes in thicknesses of 2, 3 and 4 mm. Concluding that the FFP Ribbond is biocompatible, it is very malleable and has the color of the composite resin to which it is associated, it has high resistance and quality and replaces the dental structure of structurally compromised teeth.

References

LAZARI, P. C. et al. Survival of Extensively damaged endodontically treated incisors restored with different types of posts – and- core foundation restoration material. J Protese Dent, Maio de 2018. 119 (5); 769-76.

NIKOLAENKO, S. A et al. Influência do fator C e da técnica de camadas na resistência de união à dentina por microtração. Materiais Dentários, 2015.

ZHANG, Y et al. Damage accumulation and fatigue life of particle-abraded ceramics. Int J Prosthodont; 2016.

NACARATO, P. Odontologia Biomimética [2021]. Disponível: https://www.clinicanacarato.com.br/odontologia-biomimetica/ Acesso em: 03 de Mar.de 2023.

MAGNE, P. et al. Composite resin core buildups – with na without- post for the restoration of endodontically treated molars without ferrule. Operative dentistry, v. 41, n.1, p. 64-75, 2016.

CHO, L. Marginal accuracyand frature strength of ceromer/fiber-reinforced compositecrowns: effect of variations in preparation desing. J. Prosthet. Dent., v. 88, n. 4, p. 388-95, Oct. 2022.

LIMA, D. et al. Comportamento biomimético dos pinos de fibra de vidro: relato de caso. v. 10, p. 296–300, 2021.

SIGEMORI, R. M. et al. Reforço intra-radicular de raizes debilitadas. Rev. bras. odontol., Rio de Janeiro, v. 69, n. 2, p. 250-4, jul./dez 2013.

SOUZA, R.O et al. Influence of brush type as a carrier of adhesive solutions and paper points as an adhesive-excess remover on the resin bond to root dentin. J Adhes Dent; 2017.

MONDELLI, J. Técnicas restauradoras para dentes com tratamento endodôntico. Rev. dent. Rest., v. 1, n. 3, p. 97-158, jul. /set. 2018.

FRANÇA, S. Odontologia restauradora na era adesiva. Rev. Assoc. Paul. Cir. Dent. vol.70 no.3 Sao Paulo Jul./Set. 2016.

MAGNE P. Scientific method, common sense, experience and the patient: “LESS IS MORE”. J Clin Dent Res. 2016 Jan-Mar;13(1):35-8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14436/2447-911x.13.1.035-038.dbe

D’SOUZA, C. Estética y biocompatibilidad de laminados dentales compuestos, Medical Journal Armed Forced India, 66 (3), págs. 239-243, 2020.

PEREIRA, J. C. et al. Tratamentos conservadores da vitalidade pulpar: princípios biológicos e clínicos. Bio Odonto: Dentística e Estética, v. 2, n. maio/ju 2004, p. 1-100, 2004. Tradução. Acesso em: 05 mar. 2023.

ALLEMAN, D. S.; NEJAD, M. A.; ALLEMAN, C. D. S. The Protocols of Biomimetic. Restorative Dentistry: 2002 to 2017. Inside Dentistry, v. 13, n. 6, 2017.

URABE I, NAKAJIMA S, SANO H, TAGAMI J. Physical properties of the dentin-enamel junction region. Am J Dent. 2000 Jun;13(3):129-35.

MILICICH G, RAINEY JT. Clinical presentations of stress distribution in teeth and
the significance in operative dentistry. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 2000
Sep;12(7):695-700; quiz 702

FELIPPE, L.A et al. Fibras de reforço para uso odontológico – Fundamentos e aplicações clínicas. Revista da APCD, v. 55, n. 4, jul/ago, 2021.

FREILICH, M. A. et al. Fiber-reinforced composites in clinical dentistry. Chicago, Quintessence, 2020.

AKMAN, S et al. Influence of several fibre-reinforced composite restoration techniques on cusp movement and fracture strength of molar teeth. International Endodontic Journal 2021.

HEMALATHA, H et al. Evaluation of fracture resistance in simulated immature teeth using Resilon and Ribbond as roots reinforcements – An in vitro study. Dental Traumatology 2019.

COBANKARA, FK et al. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars. Operative Dentistry, 2018.

TULOGLU, N et al. Different Clinical Applications of Bondable Reinforcement. Ribbond in Pediatric Dentistry. European Journal of Dentistry, 2019.

Karbhari VM, & Wang Q (2007) Influence of triaxial braid denier on ribbon-based
fiber reinforced dental composites Dental Materials 23(8) 969-976

BADAKAR, C.M et al.Fracture resistance of microhybrid composite, nano composite and fibre-reinforced composite used for incisal edge restoration. Dental Traumatology, 2021.

MELO, M.P. Evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with prefabricated posts and composites with varying quantities of remaining coronal tooth structure. Journal of Applied Oral Science, 2019.

KARNA, J. C. A fiber composite laminate endodontic post and core. Amer. J. Dent., v. 9, n. 5, p. 230-2, Oct. 2016.

SIRIMAI, S.; RIIS, D. N.; MORGANO, S. M. An in vitro study of the fracture resistance and the incidence of vertical root fracture of pulpless teeth restored with six post-and-core systems. J. prosth. Dent., v.81, n.3, p. 262-9, Mar. 2019.

BONILLA, M. E. G. Avaliação da resistência à fratura transversal de raízes amplamente destruídas reconstruídas com núcleos. Dissertação (Mestrado) – Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Universidade de São Paulo, Bauru, 2021. 110 f.

GOLDBERG, A. J. et al. Flexure properties and fiber architecture of commercial fiber reinforced composites. J. dent. Res., v. 77, n. 2, p. 226, Mar. 2015.

BOTTINO, M. A. et al. Materiais poliméricos. In: ________. Estética em reabilitação oral metal free. São Paulo, Artes Médicas, 2021. Cap. 6, p. 348-79

BUSATO, A. L. et al. Colagem de fragmentos dentários. Rev. gaúcha Odont., v. 33, n. 4, p. 326-8, out./dez. 2015.

VALLITTU, P. K. Acrylic resin – fiber composite – part Il:The effect of polymerization shrinkage of polimethylmethacrilate applied to fiber roving on tranverse strength. J.Prosthet. Dent., v.71, n.6, p. 613-617, 2014.

SAMADZADEH, A et al. Fracture strengths of provisionalrestorations reinforced with plasma-treated poliethylene fiber,.J. Prosthet. Dent, v. 78, n. 5, p. 447-50, 2017.

PORTERO, P.P et al. A utilização das fibras de reforço na odontologia. Publ. UEPG Ci. Biol. Saúde, Ponta Grossa, 11 (3/4): 47-52, set./dez.2015.

KIMMEL, S. S. Restoration and reinforcement of endodontically treated with a polyethylene ribbon and prefabricated fiberglass post. Gen. Dent., v. 48, n. 6, p. 700-6, Nov./Dec. 2022.

RUDO, D. N.; KARBHARI, M. E. Physical behaviors of fiber reinforcement as applied to tooth stabilization. Dent. Clin. N. Amer., v. 43, n. 1, p. 7-35, Jan. 2015.

NISHIOKA, R. S. et al. Apresentação de Caso Clínico — Prótese Parcial Fixa Adesiva sem Metal com Fibras de Polietileno e Resina Solidex. JBC, v. 5, n. 25, p. 65-68, Jan./Fev. 2021.

GIORDANO, R. Fiber reinforced composite resin systems. Gen. Dent., Chicago, v. 48, n. 3,p. 244-249 May-Jun, 2020.

TRUSHKOWSKY, R. D. Fabrication of na anterior resin composite bridge with polyetylene fiber reinforcement. Am. J. Dent., San Antonio, v. 9, n. 4, p. 179, Aug. 2016.

DALFOVO, M. S.; LANA, R. A.; SILVEIRA, A. Métodos quantitativos e qualitativos: um resgate teórico. Revista Interdisciplinar Científica Aplicada, Blumenau, v.2, n.4, p.01-
13.

GIL, A.C. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. 6. ed - 5. reimpr. – São Paulo: Atlas, 2016.

LAKATOS, E. M. Fundamentos de metodologia científica. 5. ed. -São Paulo : Atlas 2013.

MICHEL, M. E. Metodologia e pesquisa científica em ciências sociais: um guia prático para acompanhamento da disciplina e elaboração de trabalhos monográficos. 3. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2019.

ORALTECH, Ibiporã, PR, Brasil. Disponível em: https://oraltech.com.br/ Acesso em: 05 de Mar. de 2023.
Published
2023-12-16
How to Cite
Soares, L., Gontijo Bernardes Lins, R., Simão, L., & Pinho, L. (2023). Advantages of using ffp ribbond in direct restorations in structurally compromised teeth. Revista Cathedral, 5(4), 129-141. Retrieved from http://cathedral.ojs.galoa.com.br/index.php/cathedral/article/view/750

Most read articles by the same author(s)